La misión organizativa en las empresas tecnológicas: una perspectiva de género
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Resumo
Este estudio analiza la influencia del género en la percepción de la misión organizativa, a partir de la dimensión misión del Modelo de Denison de Cultura Organizativa (Modelo DOCS) y de sus subdimensiones visión, metas y objetivos y dirección estratégica, en una empresa del sector tecnológico español. Se adopta un diseño cuantitativo transversal aplicado a una organización líder del sector (n = 487), utilizando la escala DOCS validada en español y comparando las valoraciones de género mediante análisis estadísticos. Los resultados sugieren diferencias estadísticamente significativas por género en las subdimensiones visión y metas y objetivos, indicando que las mujeres tienden a valorar en mayor medida componentes asociados a una orientación de largo plazo, inclusiva y ética. En contraste, no se observan diferencias significativas en la percepción de la dirección estratégica, lo que sugiere que esta subdimensión podría estar más condicionada por rutinas organizativas y marcos de gestión estandarizados propios del sector tecnológico. Los hallazgos son consistentes con la teoría de la identidad social y la teoría de la congruencia de roles, y aportan evidencia empírica sobre la interpretación diferenciada de la Cultura Organizativa (CO) y de la misión según el género en contextos tecnológicos.
Downloads
Article Details
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.
Este artículo se distribuye bajo Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) .
Referências
Alharthi, F. B. (2024). Diferencias de género en las percepciones de liderazgo y su influencia en la motivación entre los miembros de la facultad de la Universidad de Taif. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1476526. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1476526
Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom, C. P. M., y Peterson, M. F. (Eds.). (2010). The handbook of organizational culture and climate (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Bass, B. M., y Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
Bear, S., Rahman, N., y Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207– 221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
Begeny, C. T., Ryan, M. K., Moss-Racusin, C. A., y Ravetz, G. (2020). In some professions, women have become well represented, yet gender bias persists—Perpetuated by those who think it is not happening. Science Advances, 6(26), eaba7814. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba7814
Bonavia, T., Prado, V., y García-Hernández, A. (2013). Adaptación al español del instrumento sobre cultura organizacional de Denison. Summa Psicológica, 7(1), 15–32.
Brescoll, V. L. (2016). Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 415– 428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.005
Cameron, B. H., y Butcher-Powell, L. (2006). Gender differences among IT professionals in dealing with change and skill set maintenance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 1, 151-157. https://doi.org/10.28945/120
Castro-Martínez, A., Pérez-Ordóñez, C., y Moreno-Albarracín, B. (2024). Bienestar y felicidad laboral como estrategia de sostenibilidad empresarial: Un análisis de las organizaciones españolas certificadas con el sello B- Corp. methaodos.revista de ciencias sociales, 12(1), m241201a04. https://doi.org/10.17502/mrcs.v12i1.758
Cha, H., Uchida, Y., y Choi, E. (2023). Gender differences in perceived legitimacy and status perception in leadership role. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1088190
Cook, A., y Glass, C. (2013). Women and top leadership positions: Toward an institutional analysis. Gender, Work & Organization, 21(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12018
Denison, D. R., y Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.204
Diehl, A. B., y Dzubinski, L. M. (2016). Making the invisible visible: A cross-sector analysis of gender-based leadership barriers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 27(2), 181– 206. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21248
Diehl, A. B., Stephenson, A. L., Dzubinski, L. M., y Wang, D. C. (2020). Measuring the invisible: Development and multi-sector validation of the Gender Bias Scale for women leaders. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 31(3), 249–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21389
Díez Martín, F., Miotto, G., y Cachón Rodríguez, G. (2022). Organizational legitimacy perception: Gender and uncertainty as bias for evaluation criteria. Journal of Business Research, 139, 426– 436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.073
Eagly, A. H., y Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business School Press.
Eagly, A. H., y Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00241
Eagly, A. H., y Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
Eagly, A. H., y Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. En P. A. M. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, y E. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 458–476). SAGE Publications.
Ely, R. J., y Meyerson, D. E. (2000). Advancing gender equity in organizations: The challenge and importance of maintaining a gender narrative. Organization, 7(4), 589– 608. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840074005
Galsanjigmed, E., y Sekiguchi, T. (2026). Gendered Leadership in Organizations: Men and Women. Encyclopedia, 6(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia6010016
Gorman, E. H., y Mosseri, S. (2019). How organizational characteristics shape gender difference and inequality at work. Sociology Compass, 13(3), e12660. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12660
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s recent consequences: Using dimension scores in theory and research. International. Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/147059580111002
Jonsen, K., Maznevski, M. L., y Schneider, S. C. (2010). Gender differences in leadership—Believing is seeing: Implications for managing diversity. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 29(6), 549– 572. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151011067504
Kim, J. Y., y Collins, K. M. (2020). Leadership perceptions, gender, and dominant personality: Interaction effects on leadership evaluation. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(5), 101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103984
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., y Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616– 642. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023557
Mascarenhas, C., Galvão, A. R., y Marques, C. S. (2022). How perceived organizational support, identification with organization and work engagement influence job satisfaction: A gender-based perspective. Administrative Sciences, 12(2), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12020066
Özmutlu, K. A., y Arun, K. (2024). Effects of gender diversity in strategic orientation and strategy execution: Evidence from logistics firms. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2021-0494
Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., Smith Sockbeson, C. E., Hall, A. V., y Halliday, C. S. (2024). Gender and evaluations of leadership behaviors: A meta-analytic review of 50 years of research. The Leadership Quarterly, 35(6), 101822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101822
Post, C., Rahman, N., y Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50(1), 189– 223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394642
Ramaswami, A., Dreher, G. F., Bretz, R. D., y Wiethoff, C. (2021). Gender, mentoring, and career success: The importance of organizational context. Journal of Management, 47(1), 81– 107. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01174.x
Ridgeway, C. L. (2009). Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender & Society, 23(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208330313
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. ISBN 978-0-470-18586-5
Smith, S. D., y Thomas, T. F. (2024). The effects of strategic alignment and strategic clarity on multidimensional task performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 112, 101524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2023.101524
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. En H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 61–76). Academic Press.
Tokbaeva, D., y Achtenhagen, L. (2023). Career resilience of female professionals in the male-dominated IT industry in Sweden: Toward a process perspective. Gender, Work & Organization, 30(1), 223– 262. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12671
Utoft, E. H. (2020). Exploring linkages between organisational culture and gender equality work—An ethnography of a multinational engineering company. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, 101791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101791
Wulandari, S., Septian, E., Suryohayati, P. H., y Saputri, N. E. R. (2025). Gender relations and organizational culture in intra-school student organizations: Socialization and development. Abdimas Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang, 10(2), 475-485. https://doi.org/10.26905/abdimas.v10i2.14232
Zenger, J., y Folkman, J. (2012, March 15). Are women better leaders than men? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2012/03/a-study-in-leadership-women-do
Zhang, G., Jia, Z., y Yan, S. (2022). Does gender matter? The relationship comparison of strategic leadership on organizational ambidextrous behavior between male and female CEOs. Sustainability, 14(14), 8559. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148559